Most career frustration is not caused by laziness, incompetence, or poor attitude.
It comes from risk.
More specifically, from how unevenly risk is distributed inside organizations.
Once you see that distribution clearly, many confusing dynamics stop being personal and start making sense.
What risk asymmetry actually means
Risk asymmetry exists when different people experience very different consequences from the same decision.
One person gets upside.
Another absorbs downside.
A third gets credit without exposure.
This is not a moral judgment. It is a structural reality.
Organizations are built to route risk away from certain roles and toward others. The routing is rarely explicit, but it is consistent.
Why frustration concentrates at certain levels
Mid to senior professionals often feel the most frustration because they sit at a specific intersection.
They have responsibility without full authority.
They have accountability without control.
They are close enough to absorb consequences, but far enough from decisions to be surprised by them.
When something fails, they clean it up.
When something succeeds, the credit often travels upward or outward.
Over time, this creates a sense that effort and outcome are weakly correlated.
They are.
The invisible bargain
Many roles include an unspoken trade.
You will absorb volatility.
In return, you will receive stability.
This bargain is reasonable for a while. It provides learning, trust, and access. The problem arises when the trade stops being temporary.
If you keep absorbing risk without gaining leverage, frustration accumulates. Not because you are failing, but because the exchange rate has stopped working.
You are paying more and getting less.
Why good work is not enough here
Good work does not rebalance risk.
In fact, competence often increases exposure. People route risk toward those who can handle it. The better you are under pressure, the more pressure you receive.
This is why highly capable people often feel stuck cleaning up other peoples decisions.
They are trusted to catch the falling knives.
Trust, without authority, is a risk multiplier.
The career health signal
The signal to watch is not workload. It is where consequences land.
Ask yourself:
-
When things go wrong, who feels it first
-
When things go right, who benefits most
-
Who decides, and who absorbs the fallout
If the answers consistently point away from you on upside and toward you on downside, frustration is the rational response.
You are operating in an asymmetrical system.
Naming the problem changes your options
Understanding risk asymmetry does not fix it automatically.
It does, however, change what you negotiate for.
Instead of asking for more work, you ask for more authority.
Instead of proving reliability, you clarify decision boundaries.
Instead of absorbing everything, you make risk visible.
Career health improves when risk and reward move closer together.
A closing thought
If you feel persistently frustrated despite doing good work, stop asking what you are doing wrong.
Ask where the risk is flowing.
That answer explains more than motivation ever will.
Tomorrow, we will look at how organizations remember failure, and why memory is another hidden force shaping careers long after incidents fade.